Disaster Resource Guide Advertisers   Disaster Resource Guide Advertisers   Disaster Resource Guide Advertisers   Disaster Resource Guide Advertisers   Disaster Resource Guide Advertisers

Traditional Threats and New Risk Complexities have Manufacturing Environments Spinning


Fierce competition is the name of the game in manufacturing today. The expansion and exploitation of global markets, advances in digital technologies, and process improvement opportunities both domestically and abroad, are increasing the complexity and risks associated with manufacturing products. As manufacturers are forced to respond to these changes, they are becoming more and more dependent on complex information technology systems, single and highly integrated suppliers, the operability of fewer and larger plants, automated back-office support functions, and critical function outsourcing.

With these revolutionary changes, the ability to prevent a major interruption and to limit the loss potential is of paramount concern. Without the implementation of the appropriate procedures, corporations play Russian Roulette every business day. The ability to respond to and recover from a major system collapse or interruption is essential, for the cost of recovery might be too high to bear. It is vital manufacturing companies deploy business continuity solutions across the entire enterprise, including supplier and customer networks, to ensure the recovery of its business processes within a timeframe that is consistent with the needs of the business.

Gone are the days of localized manufacturing and production facilities with limited distribution channels. Instead, manufacturing companies are operating with highly complex, integrated production and marketing systems in a networked, collaborative environment linking large numbers of customers and suppliers. This effort is providing real-time synergies between internal and external business operations. In turn, there is dramatic improvement in cycle times and in the synchronization of members of the value chain. These performance benefits are most pronounced in the areas of lean manufacturing, e-commerce, enterprise-wide financial and inventory software deployments, concurrent manufacturing techniques, B2B exchanges, and supply chain management.

But the above-mentioned factors have also led to the inability to segregate manufacturing risk and reduce threat through traditional means (e.g., separation and duplication of facilities or processes). As a result, manufacturers have increased their exposure to traditional threats and have opened the door to new and highly complicated risk factors. Given the occurrence and volatility of change, the exposures to business interruption and the potential for time element losses within the manufacturing environment are ever-widening. Some of the specific risk factors impacting the manufacturing industry today include:

• Dependency and reliance upon the adequacy of the public infrastructure of newly and emerging industrialized countries in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe and Latin America
• The need to maintain 100% up-time of communication networks to ensure enterprise management systems connectivity
• Increased emphasis on raw material staging and inventory management capabilities to support Just-In-Time manufacturing
• The potential impact of a severe loss caused by sole suppliers in order to maintain thin margins and production timeframes
• Highly localized and integrated manufacturing facilities increasing the concentration of property values and exposures for the manufacturer and supplier
• The lack of flexibility and increased dependency resulting from the outsourcing of key back-office support functions
• The need to maintain reliable and accountable operating procedures given the transparent governance structures of foreign suppliers and partners
• The importance of maintaining robust Knowledge Management systems promoting integration of people, tools and processes
• The need to quickly respond to processing bottlenecks and functional interdependencies
• The need to prioritize vulnerabilities based on interruption impacts and tolerance levels

The good news is manufacturing advancements continue to bring about positive changes relative to overall manufacturer productivity and in the integration of all members of the value chain on a global scale. The bad news is that as manufacturer's dependence upon technology continues to intensify and evolve, the issue of availability - and its potential to alter the fate of an entire manufacturing concern - becomes vital. Through the development of business continuity procedures and the implementation of recovery standards across all members of the value chain, businesses are much more likely to avert the implications associated with the threat of failure.

As the laundry list of failure points grows, the issue is not whether a failure will occur - it is whether your organization has the ability to limit the failure's implications and the negative impact to the business. Only through formal, documented, and communicated business continuity strategies may your business be protected and the risk of the threat mitigated. Only through the development of a robust continuance capability is it possible to circumvent the threat and help ensure your organization's survival.


About the Author
Rob Quaranto is a member of the GE GAP Services' Business Continuity Solutions team. He may be reached by calling (216) 241-3493 or emailing Rob.Quaranto@gegapservices.com

 

The Business Continuity Yardstick: How do You Measure Up?

Get a basic sense of where you sit on the business continuity maturity spectrum. Measure the characteristics of your organization against those traits commonly shared by companies having sound business continuity management programs.

• A formal organization has been chartered, assigned accountability and responsibility for enterprise-wide business continuity management.

• A comprehensive organization-wide business continuity management process has been developed and takes into account the type, nature and likelihood of various risk scenarios, mission critical business processes, minimal acceptable down-time, and strategies to restore these processes to an acceptable service level.

• The organization has a viable business resumption and disaster recovery plan in place that falls under the purview of a corporate business continuity plan.

• Risk analysis and business impact analysis documentation exist and are frequently updated by the organization.

• Processes are in place to regularly test continuity procedures to ensure they are responsive to mission-critical business function needs.

• Automated tools are used to communicate and maintain the business continuity plan. It is integrated into the overall business process with automatic plan updates.

• Data back-up and recovery processes have been fully automated (e.g. no human intervention) for all critical business processes and current backup media has been properly stored off-site.

• Training and awareness plans and schedules are executed. All personnel are aware of recovery plan provisions, key personnel, and roles and responsibilities during a business interruption.

• Proactive human factors and considerations have been made for employees and their families. Key considerations are public communications practices, crisis counseling, family emergency response plans, and family support networks.

• Metrics are collected and managed to ensure that continuity-related recovery objectives and service level agreements are met after the plan has been activated.

 

 
 
Copyright ©2008 DISASTER RESOURCE GUIDE P.O. Box 15243, Santa Ana, CA 92735 714/558-8940
Fax 714/558-8901